Printable View
The fast lens is a big part of it, but any decent photo editor can make up for some light weirdness...Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Coonkat
Here's one of your originals of Walter
http://www.sonic.net/~claudel/20110407-2.jpg
Here, I balanced the light and shaded parts using iPhoto and sized it and adjusted the contrast and saturation with Graphic Converter...
http://www.sonic.net/~claudel/walter-iphoto.jpg
I didn't try to fix the eyes, but others have made some good suggestions for that.
I have never had much luck with the red-eye reduction preflash with the cats, as it distracts them. Plus, even if their pupils are open only a bit you can still get eyeshine that wrecks the photo.
Another advantage of a good quality digital camera is the ability to crop photos and still end up with usable size. It is often quite hard to frame a shot optimally when rushing to shoot something cute. So definitely you should not consider a photo final until you have considered reframing it.
Most digital SLRs will also allow you to shoot in "raw mode" which effectively stores the raw sensor data. This provides the very best starting point for manipulating your photos. If you frequently manipulate exposure, etc. in your photos, you should store raw mode versions. The JPEG versions have already been manipulated in the camera, so there is a limit to how much you can change them without getting artifacts. I think most DSLRs will allow you to have the camera store both a JPEG and raw version. That is what I have my Canon set to do. That way, if I need to manipulate exposure or white balance, I am starting with maximum information.
I have advice and I have opinions. I am going to mix them up, so you choose which you want :LOL:
If you are serious about getting shots of your furry kids then a fast reacting "proper" camera - typically a DSLR - is what you want. While I take lots of cute shots with my crappy camera phone, most of them are just blurred cause no one will stay still long enough for the shutter to react. A basic DSLR with a "kit" lens will set you back of the order of £400-£600. If it's a "bridge" camera - a DSLR type but with a fixed, unchangeable lens - then it's a great start but you will want to try more lenses later.
Like has been said, a fast prime lens for a DSLR is a good way to go. A basic 50mm f/1.8 for either Canon or Nikon is about £100 new and can be got for less. I spoilt myself and bought a lovely Canon 100mm f/2.8 IS Macro for Xmas in anticipation of the boys arrival. The image stabiliser combined with the macro is wonderful. You need a macro if you want decent face shots - unless you shell out for a fast 200mm lens and if you can do that then you would have already :koolkat:
Add to the macro the potential with the macro ring flash (which I've had for years, was cheap once but is now £600! Ok, maybe not that then. I swear I only paid half that once.) However, ring flashes can make red/green eye worse as the flash is effectively in-line with the lens and so you get reflections from the back of the eyes.
The way to avoid green eye is to have the flash well of axis of the lens - so this means an external flash unit, typically mounted on the hotshoe. Again, these are going up in price because of the Yen vs everyone else. A Canon 580EXII is now not far off £400 - again probably twice what I paid 4 years ago for the 580EX original. I feel lucky I invested back then...
Then, I always shoot "RAW" plus JPEG. For those who haven't come across what raw files are think of them as a digital negative which can be reprocessed/reprinted from in different ways as opposed to a JPEG which is pretty much like a Polaroid or an old audio cassette. You can do stuff with them afterwards, but every additional change will degrade the resulting output file - like making mix tapes from other tapes.
The only changes I typically make are exposure and colour balance (the latter includes white balance, saturation etc.). I also use some of the lens-fixup tools in the software but they are not so critical. I never, for myself, crop images or remove red/green eye, but if I am preparing shots for others I will do so if they ask. I am one of those "old school" shooters that believes in what was there was there and should stay there :smile:
Personally, I have the top end Canon 1Ds MkIII but that's because one year I got a great bonus at work and I wanted to treat myself. It doesn't make me a great photographer, but it make life so much easier. Like many, we can indulge ourselves in difference ways - in my case my car is worth considerably less than my camera body, let alone the lenses.
PS Anyone near North London who wants their darlings shot - in the photography way onyl! - I am happy to entertain the idea in exchange for tea and biscuits. I don't make money out of photography, it's more a labour of love. I appear to have slots free sometime next year - now that my three boys are home and growing I have no social life and the only things I shoot are them :rofl: