Thread: Dangers of feeding commercial (Purina) pet food

Originally Posted by candes

It would have been just geography.

So then you are seeing it also? The article had an opinion different from some folks here, thus the havoc.

Of course! Clearly the four people here that are strong believers in feeding raw welcome no opinion or debate that dissents from their own and will go to great lengths to make you feel unwelcome as was done to me just about the moment I joined. Look at how Debbie560 asked me where I'd read that raw feeding could be dangerous, stating that she'd be interested to read it. When I posted it, as a newbie not knowing that no anti-raw material is allowed in the raw food "discussion", she edited her post as if she had never posed the question. I can only assume that she did this to either get the post removed because she didn't agree with the article or was trying to get me punted off the site altogether as someone who doesn't adhere to the rules. Then she decided to yell at me when I asked her why she'd do what she did to me instead of answering my question.
You will never change these people's hearts and minds and allowing them to goad you into an argument only makes it unpleasant for people who really do want to know both sides of the issue. I assume that's why there is a place for information on both sides where the other side cannot chime in.