Results 1 to 8 of 8
Threaded View
-
4th March 2012, 09:27 PM #5Top Cat




- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Netherlands
- Posts
- 1,233
- Thanks
- 97
- Thanked 228 Times in 215 Posts
- Images
- 42
Some studies show that raw-fed dogs and cats shed more pathogens such as salmonella and e.coli in their feces than commercially-fed dogs and cats. So perhaps the people in your puppy class were nervous about raw-fed dogs spreading infection.
I once read about a pet therapy program in the US that excludes raw-fed pets too, for the same reason. Made me wonder how many old folks or sick kids got salmonella infection before that measure was implemented, and whether their numbers dropped afterwards.
In my country we have no such stipulations, at least not that I've heard of. Also I can't see how they could be justified... during puppy training or a pet therapy session people don't play with cat or dog poo, do they?
Perhaps in your country fear of litigation might play a part... excluding even the remotest of risks to avoid a lawsuit.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Antonia For This Useful Post:
Howlinbob (4th March 2012)



8Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote
Bookmarks